A look into book industry and the two genres of this site

Here’s an overview of how the publishing industry works economically, followed by an estimated comparison of whether fantasy or science-fiction might be more profitable as genres.

⸻

The Economics of the Publishing Industry
• Trade book publishing (novels intended for the general public) is hit-driven. A small number of titles generate most of the profit, while many titles may lose money or simply break even. 
• Profit margins for trade publishers tend to be modest: a well-run trade publisher might see operating margins in the “high single-digits” to low teens (perhaps ~5-15 %) after all costs. 
• The cost structure typically involves: retailers taking a sizable cut of cover price; authors earning royalties (often ~10-15% for hardcovers in traditional publishing) ; manufacturing/printing, marketing, distribution, returns, etc all eat into the margin.
• On the revenue side, genres matter: growth trends show that certain genres are increasing in share. For example, recent data show that the combined science-fiction & fantasy category saw strong growth in value sales in 2024. 

So: in publishing you need a combination of strong demand, repeat purchases/back-list, and often series or large readership to generate reliable profits.

⸻

Fantasy vs Science Fiction: Which is More Profitable?

Here are the factors and an estimate:

Why Fantasy may have an edge:
• The global market size for fantasy books is estimated at ~US$19.1 billion in 2024, with projected growth to ~$25.5 billion by 2030. 
• Fantasy (especially epic fantasy, urban fantasy, romance-fantasy crossovers) tends to have strong series potential: readers buy multiple volumes, which raises lifetime value of a reader.
• On self-publishing / indie side, fantasy subgenres such as paranormal & urban fantasy dominate in unit sales for SF&F categories. 
• Some evidence suggests fantasy may command higher “engagement” or longer tail: one analysis noted that fantasy ebooks had higher CPMs (cost per thousand impressions) than sci-fi in some digital platforms. 

Why Sci-Fi still holds strong but may be slightly at disadvantage:
• Sci-fi appeals to a dedicated niche – space opera, hard science-fiction, dystopian. That niche can yield strong breakthrough hits, but the readership might be narrower than broad-appeal fantasy.
• Some data suggest that sci-fi authors earn lower average incomes: one site noted that up to 90% of sci-fi authors earn under US$15,000 per year from publishing. 
• Sci-fi may require heavier world-building of technical or speculative complexity, which might raise cost/time to produce a book (though that is not a direct profitability metric).

Given the data, I would conclude that fantasy has a slight profitability edge over pure science fiction in the current trade-book market. The reasons:
• Larger market size for fantasy books overall (per the market statistics).
• Greater series potential (higher reader lifetime value) and crossover appeal (fantasy + romance, YA fantasy etc).
• Higher digital engagement/indie profitability signals for fantasy in SF&F combined markets.

That said profitability for any given title depends heavily on the author, series length, marketing, platform, and whether it becomes a “breakout” hit. Sci-fi can absolutely be profitable, and some sci-fi titles may outperform many fantasy titles, but on average fantasy appears the safer bet for stronger returns.